|
| 首页 | 新闻 | 组织 | 培训 | 联络 | 招聘 | 影集 | 商机 | 链接 | 国内联络 |
Orgnization & History
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reader's Feedback |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[From Frazer, Seattle, WA, USA] Dear Sir: Read your mail and visited your SCOBA site. Well done. The trip is on one hand of high profile, well fanfared and on the other, only limited, if not entirely unpractical, to a few "eye-catching" seminars, not to mention the apparent political connotations and repercussions that are probably the main tenet to those who organized it. I by no means intend to criticize those who are members of the delegation, after all, who would turn down an opportunity like that? No one would, I guess. Having said that sarcastically, I still highly approve of the enthusiasms exuberated from and manifested in all the endeavors by those who sincerely believed their efforts would make some differences to the home country's fledging hi-tech. Maybe a trickle here now and there then would eventually make a visible transfiguration of the entire landscape. My wholeheartedly blessings to such endeavors. The funny situation now in China is that interests are mainly from officials instead of from grassroots. Yes, a government-mediated technology revolution sounds like a plausible solution, however, historically and universally, government in this regard has proven to be more failing than succeeding. We have repeatedly seen projects after projects failed under the auspice of grandeur government plans and investments, with much resources channeled only to the fathomless pockets of greedy and sucking officials. Only industry induced interests would sustain a long-term and stable growth where immediate commercial benefits can be realized at calculated risks, i.e., a calculable economic return on investments in hi-tech would be obtained with cost/risk analysis. Though not an absolute statement, as a rule of thumb, hi-tech is associated with the presence of mighty companies that are eager to make technical innovations to keep competitive edge in the industry. While in China, first of all, such mighty companies are scarce (mighty does not mean being only big), secondly, companies in China are not that eager to make change, thirdly, being competitive in the market does not have the same urgency as it is here. If hi-tech is only discussed in the government meetings or to be only centered in scattered universities, there would be no hi-tech in its real sense. While most state-owned companies are struggling to keep heads above water, there is little resource and attention left for them to care for hi-tech R&D---a dangerous undertaking, after all---thus can we predict a stagnant, painful and bumpy road toward the prosperity of hi-tech in China. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[FROM JAPAN] Dear Sir: I have viewed your web site. And I knew SCOBA last year's visit to and activities in China from the famous Japanese TV - NHK. Last Aug, I went back to China for the 3rd CAST (China Assosiation for Science and Technology) Conference for Young Scientists and Technicans in Beijing, but failed to find co-operation. I am also a leader of an ogernization, "Chinese in Japan," and like to do things for our motherland. I am living in Japan. I'd like to find co-operating parterner to develop my new bar code invention into products. Thank you for readin and Best Wiches! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Email comments to webmaster@zaptron.com. |
Copyright @ 2010 www.scoba.org 美国加利福尼亚州注册号：C2349496 版权所有：硅谷留美博士企业家协会
|
From Seattle, WA, USA
